Final Exam:
Wednesday, May 21, 2003, 5-8 pm. 237 Hearst Gym.
The final exam is worth 100 points.
Part
I. Identifications. (30 points total)
Of the following thirty terms, fifteen will appear on the final
exam and you will be asked to identify ten. Each identification
will be worth 3 points. In an identification, be sure to include
the relevant information (who, what, when, where, how, why)
as well as its significance. Write full sentences, not notes,
otherwise you may be penalized.
Adolf Eichmann
Prague Spring
Ausgleich
Battle of the Somme
Cecil Rhodes
Collectivization
Fourteen Points
Giuseppe Garibaldi
Gracchus Babeuf
Helsinki Agreements
Philippe (Henri) Pétain
Charles De Gaulle
Chartists
Id, Ego, and Super-ego
Imre Nagy
|
Josip Broz
Lebensraum
March on Rome
Marshall Plan
New Economic Policy
Otto von Bismarck
Paris Commune
perestroika
realpolitik
sans-culottes
Social Darwinism
Solidarity
Stalingrad (1942-1943)
Václav Havel
First International
|
Part II: Essays. (70 points total)
Of the following seven essay questions, FOUR
will appear on the final exam and you will be asked to answer
TWO. Each essay will be worth 35 points. Your answers
MUST make use of all relevant material: lectures, assigned texts,
including novels, movies and documents discussed in Kishlansky
and Spielvogel.
1. Were the two World Wars one long war (as proposed in the
Thirty Years’ War thesis) or two separate conflicts? Explain
the origins of the conflict(s) and describe the consequences
for Europe.
2. What was new about “the new imperialism” of
the late nineteenth century? Did it play as Lenin claimed, a
role in the origins of World War I? And why did empire unravel
so quickly in the years 1945-1962?
3. What was the Utopian element in Stalin’s Russia, Hitler’s
Germany and Mussolini’s Italy and what part did terror
play in each of the three regimes? What links, if any, can you
discern between these twentieth century ideologies and your
study of the Enlightenment and French Revolution? Make sure
that you discuss the goals and policies of all three dictatorships.
4. “‘Warum?’ I asked him in my poor
German. ‘Hier ist kein warum’ (here there
is no why) he replied.” [Levi, Survival in Auschwitz,
p. 29] How do you, as a historian, explain the Holocaust? Why
did some, like Levi, survive? [Levi, pp.175-187]
5. “There [in Bohemia], things did not go according to
the old formula of one group of people (a class, a nation) set
against another, but instead, people (a generation of men and
women) rebelled against their own youth...That is the period
commonly referred to as the ‘Prague Spring’: the
guardians of the idyll saw themselves forced to remove microphones
from private apartments...” [Milan Kundera, The Book
of Laughter and Forgetting, pp. 18-19]
Compare and contrast the social, cultural and political changes
of 1968 in Soviet dominated Europe and in Western Europe. In
what sense, if any, were the changes revolutionary? Make sure
that in assessing the impact of the 1960s you discuss the causes
of the collapse of Communism in 1989.
6. How do you reconcile European nationalism, which has spawned
so much conflict since 1789 with the creation and enlargement
of the European Union in the years 1945-2003? Does integration
mean the end of nationalism and the nation state?
7. “Individuality, the first-person singular always existed
under Communism, it was just exiled from public and political
life and exercised in private. Thus the terrible hypocrisy with
which we learned to live.is having its backlash now...”
[Slavenka Drakulic, Café Europa, p. 4]
Explain what Drakulic means in this context and describe with
examples from her book the legacy of Communism for the post-1989
regimes of central and Eastern Europe.
|
Due Monday, April 21st (**amended deadline from syllabus)
at 4 PM in your GSI’s mailbox in the History Department
Main Office (3229 Dwinelle). Late papers will lose one third
of a grade per day, including weekends. A rewrite will be
possible only if a paper receives a C- or less and at the
discretion of your GSI. No electronic submissions will be
accepted.
In an essay of 1250 words maximum (five typed pages, double
spaced, with standard margins and numbered pages), answer
one of the following questions. You will also be required
to hand in any notes or rough drafts utilized in the preparation
of the paper. See your GSI for proper citation method.
1. Is European history until the First World War a story
of progress or decline according to different thinkers and
sources? Include as part of your answer each author’s
view of human nature and the specific historical events that
may have shaped each author's view of humanity and history.
2. To what extent does The Communist Manifesto succeed in
comprehensively describing the rise and fall of modern industrial
capitalism? In responding, consider the arguments of Marx
& Engels in terms of politics, economics, philosophy,
and history. In light of other course materials, how would
you improve on their account?
3. Compare and contrast the historical origins of and the
impact on European history that resulted from the French Revolution
and the Russian Revolution.
|
|
Petrarch Assignment:
Document Summary
On page 316 of Spielvogel is an extract from Petrarch's work The Ascent
of Mount Ventoux, one of the literary classics of the Italian Renaissance
(also see below).
Your assignment is to write a single typed page (carefully proof-read)
summary of this document (250 words maximum).
You will not need to do any additional research in order to complete
the assignment BUT make sure you read the relevant section of Spielvogel,
chapter 12, p.316.
The summary is due, along with the map assignment, in your section
leaders’ boxes in the History Department main office, 3229 Dwinelle,
on Friday January 24th at 4pm.
Here is the extract:
Pretrarch has long been regarded as me father of Italian
Renaissance humanism. One of his literary masterpieces was The
Ascent of Mount Ventoux, A colorful description of an attempt
to climb a mountain in Province in southern France and survey the
world from its top. Petrarch's primary interest is in presenting an
allegory of his own soul’s struggle to achieve a higher spiritual
state. The work is addressed to a professor of theology in Paris who
had initially led Petrarch to read Augustine. The latter had experienced
a vivid conversion to Christianity almost a thousand years earlier.
Petrarch, The Ascent of Mount Ventoux
"Today I ascended the highest mountain in this region, which,
not without cause, they call the Windy Peak. Nothing but the desire
to see its conspicuous height was the reason for this undertaking.
For many years I have been intending to make this expedition. You
know that since my early childhood, as fate tossed around human affairs,
I have been tossed around in these parts, and this mountain, visible
far and wide from everywhere, is always in your view. So I was at
last seized by the impulse to accomplish what I had always wanted
to do....
[After some false starts, Petrarch finally achieves his goal and
arrives at the top of Mount Ventoux.]
I was glad of the progress I had made but I wept over my imperfection
and was grieved by the fickleness of all that men do In this manner
I seemed to have somehow forgotten the place I had come to and why,
until I was warned to throw off such sorrows, for which another place
would be appropriate. I had better look around and see what I had
intended to see in coming here. The time to leave was approaching,
they said…. Like a man aroused from sleep, I turned back and
looked toward the west... One could see most distinctly the mountains
of the province of Lyons to the right and, to the left, the sea near
Marseilles as well as the waves that break against Aigues-Mortes….The
Rhóne River was directly under our eyes.
I admired every detail, now relishing earthly enjoyment, now lifting
up my mind to spheres after the example of my body, and I thought
it fit to look in the volume of Augustine’s Confessions which
I owe to your loving kindness and preserve carefully, keeping it always
in my hands, in remembrance of the author as well as the donor....
I opened it with the intention of reading whatever might occur to
me first…. I happened to hit upon the tenth book of the work....
Where I fixed my eyes first, it was written: “And men go to
admire the high mountains, the vast floods of the sea, the huge streams
of the rivers, the circumference of the ocean, and the revolutions
of the stars—and desert themselves.” I was stunned, I
confess. I bade my brother [who had accompanied him], who wanted to
hear more, not to molest me, and closed the book, angry with myself
that I still admired earthly things. Long since I ought to have learned,
even from, pagan philosophers, that “nothing is admirable besides
the soul; compared to its greatness nothing is great."
I was completely satisfied with what I had seen of the mountain and
tuned my inner eye toward myself. From this hour nobody heard me say
a word until we arrived at the bottom These words occupied me sufficiently.
I could not imagine that this had happened to me by chance. I was
convinced that whatever I had read there was said to me and to nobody
else. I remembered that Augustine once suspected the same regarding
himself, when, while he was reading the Apostolic Epistles, the first
passage that occurred to him was, as he himself relates: “Not
in banqueting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not
in strife and envying; but put you on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make
no provision for the flesh to fulfill you lusts.”
Map
Assignment:
On the two blank maps of the European continent locate (draw in, if
necessary) the following features:
1492:
Cities: Florence; Granada (Spain); Paris; Prague; Vienna; Amsterdam
Boundaries: Holy Roman Empire; Ottoman Empire; Papal States
Geography: Rhine river; Pyrenees; Alps
|
 |
2003:
Cities:
Rome; Madrid; London; Warsaw; Istanbul; Bordeaux
Boundaries: Hungary; Belgium, Germany
Geography: Danube river; Elbe river; Seine river
|
 |
|