 |
History 138: Science in the U.S.
Class 37 (11/18)
Cold War
|
| Navigation |
|
| Outline |
Concerns after Hiroshima
Cold War
Confronting communism abroad
The Korean War (1950-53) and the scientists
The arms race
The nature of the race
The hydrogen bomb
Megatonnage, deterrence, and miniaturization
Military posture and scientific superiority
Consequences
Short-term actions, long-term effects
The American psyche
Civil nuclear power and proliferation |
| Names and
Terms |
| Primary |
Secondary |
Harry S Truman (Pres 1945-1953, D)
Josef Stalin (1879-1953)
Atomic Energy Commission
H-bomb = thermonuclear bomb = fusion bomb
kiloton, megaton
Dwight D. Eisenhower (Pres 1953-1961, R)
Atoms for Peace (begun 1953) |
Franck Report (1945)
Truman Doctrine, containment
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Edward Teller (1908- )
Trinity, Hiroshima, Nagasaki (all 1945)
Bikini (1946), Joe-1 (1949), Eniwetok (1952)
New Look
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
Warsaw Pact |
|
| Assignment |
Louis N. Ridenour et al., "Should the Scientists Resist
Military Intrusion?", American Scholar 16 (1946-47), 213-225.
What was at stake in this debate? What were the positions, and
what arguments did the different authors advance to support them?
What futures did the different authors see for American science?
How did they construct their histories in service of their arguments?
How had World War II changed the relationship between science
and the military? Between science and the federal government? |
|
|
|
Copyright © Cathryn Carson 2002 |