| . |
Longer research assignment: Paper option |
||||
| Navigation |
|
||||
| Parameters | For the longer research assignment you have two options: an individual paper or in-class group presentation. If you choose the paper option, you will write a research paper of 7-8 pp., due at the beginning of class on Monday, May 7. | ||||
| Topics | Your paper will deal with a topic of your
choice in the history of physics since Newton. Physics is defined
as the union of those subjects that appear on the course roadmap.
You may focus on an individual, an institution, an event, a theory, an
experiment, or some other topic that seizes your interest. Physics-related
technologies or social and cultural phenomena are acceptable on the condition
that the link to physics is clear and strong. You are strongly encouraged
to contact me with your ideas; I will be glad to help brainstorm.
If your paper does not deal with the history of physics, your grade will
suffer.
The subject matter must be historical, meaning there must be some issue of temporal context or development. Topics must lie at least 15 years in the past. You are strongly encouraged to explore farther back. It is short-sighted to imagine that only recent phenomena are interesting. Your goal is to find something of your own to say, not to rehearse a story already known (to others, if not to you). So you will need a topic that is small enough for you to make your own contribution (and manageable in a paper of this length), but also interesting and significant enough to speak to broader issues. A good approach is to start from some general subject that interests you, read around a bit in secondary sources, and narrow down to a specific topic. Examples:
|
||||
| Thesis and argument | Your paper should not just report that something
happened, but examine how and why. It is not just descriptive, but
analytic and interpretive. Answer the question: "So what?"
Explain the significance and implications of your topic. Fit your
material into the context that we have been studying in this course.
You need to develop a thesis about your materials and indicate and significance of your subject. State your thesis in the introduction and organize the paper around it. A thesis is interpretive, but it is more than just an opinion; your paper must be persuasive, which means backing up your analysis. Support the thesis with concrete evidence (and respond to counterevidence). Be sure to provide specific examples and illustrations; don't leave it with generalities. And since the paper is an argument, the narrative must serve that argument. DO NOT IGNORE THIS, AND DO NOT IMAGINE THAT IT DOES NOT APPLY TO YOUR PAPER. Finding a thesis: Take a problem-oriented approach — if something is not problematic, it's not worth writing about. In the end, a thesis is an answer to an open question. A good way to find a thesis is thus to ask a question: why something happened (as long as the answer is non-trivial), why it is interesting (as long as the answer is not: because it's new to me). You have more leeway in articulating a thesis if the topic itself is novel or creative. Some things that are not theses:
Your paper should give a sense of why your topic is important and where it fits into a larger story. This is an analytical paper, however, not a stirring narrative of triumph over adversity or ignorance. You do not need a grand, global, "History Channel" introduction or conclusion with the verbal equivalent of inspirational music. Pronouncements about man's eternal desire to know or the glorious future of physics are not necessary. |
||||
| Working with sources | You must make use of at least two secondary
works of history. General collections like the Encyclopedia Britannica
are fine places to begin, but they do not count as secondary sources for
this project. Your starting points should be the books
on reserve and in the reference section of the Physics
Library, the UCB library
catalog, and the History
of Science and Technology Database of secondary works. If you
are concerned about secondary sources, I will be glad (with reasonable
lead time) to review your list.
In addition, you must use at least one primary source, a piece of documentation originating in the era you are studying. Examples include journal articles, textbooks, letters, manuscripts, oral histories, autobiographies, etc. Berkeley has excellent collections of primary sources for the history of science, whether in the main libraries, the branch libraries (Physics, etc.), the Bancroft Library (manuscript, interview, and archival materials), or the Office for History of Science and Technology (Archive for History of Quantum Physics). Also examine the links below. You can often find primary sources through secondary sources. If you prefer, however, you can also scan library shevles or catalogues to find primary sources that catch your fancy. For suggestions on research with primary sources see the research guide from the Teaching Library (also available in the library in printed form). Your paper must use sources critically. Ask who wrote them, when, for what purpose; consider what biases they may show. These strictures apply to secondary sources as well. Secondary sources, after all, are produced by the same process that you are engaging in. Do not take them as gospel truth. In constructing your own argument about the past, you need to do more than reiterating the views of your secondary sources. Don't simply cite primary materials as ornamentation to a narrative already laid out in your secondary sources. Think about them, make interpretive use of them, and build them into your argument. Be warned: There is a great deal of garbage out there on the history of physics, particularly on the web. Don't expect to go surfing the web at the last minute and find adequate sources. Websites are not always subject to the editorial oversight that assures some minimum standard of accuracy in books from reputable presses. Ask who put up a site and why. For examples of good sites see the course assignments. Much secondary source material on the web is available in print in a more reliable form. |
||||
| Citation | Part of the assignment is providing proper documentation
in proper format. You may use footnotes or endnotes, as you choose,
but other forms are not acceptable. You must also attach a
bibliography (not included in the 7-8 page limit). Be aware that
note and bibliographic format are different. You may consult
the Teaching Library introductory (non-comprehensive) guide
to citation styles. For citations to published works you may
use one of two formats: MLA (Walter S. Achtert and Joseph Gibaldi,
MLA
handbook for writers of research papers (New York: Modern Language
Association of America, 1999)) or Turabian (Kate Turabian, A manual
for writers of term papers, theses, and dissertations (Chicago: University
of Chicago Press, 1996)). Check the format even if you think you
know it, as 80% of students get it wrong. If the online guide does
not cover your case, look up the format in the library; the guide
gives references. Do this before the night before the paper is due.
For citations to primary material not covered in MLA or Turabian, you should provide information sufficient for a reader to track down the original document. For second and later references to already-cited materials, you need provide only the author's (authors') last name, shortened title, and page number (no pp., pg., etc.). To lend direct quotations more effect, use them sparingly. Save them for instances when the exact words are memorable or important. If paraphrase is equally effective, use it. Frame quotations with your own words to show how they support your argument. Remember that paraphrases need to be footnoted, too. The library guide to citation styles includes helpful guidance on avoiding plagiarism. |
||||
| Logistics | The paper must be typed, double-spaced in
normal-sized fonts with reasonable margins. It may not be submitted
by e-mail or in any other electronic form. Put your name on the first
page, include a title, and number the pages. (These should go without
saying).
The paper is due at the beginning of class on May 7. (You may of course turn it in earlier.) Standard penalties for lateness apply: each day reduces the paper grade by 2/3 of a mark. |
||||
| Reminders | Proper writing (grammar, organization, citation
format) definitely counts. Please take it seriously. You are
writing about the past, so use the past tense. Avoid passive constructions.
Make your writing straightforward and transparent.
Revising with a few days' distance will help you strengthen your case and improve your writing. Try reading the paper aloud or showing it to a friend. An argument, in the end, must be persuasive to the reader, so try to get comments from someone else. The Student Learning Center offers drop-in writing tutoring. |
||||
| Links | History
of science and technology database (entry point from on campus)
Pathfinder (online UCB catalog) Virtual Library for the History of Science, Technology & Medicine Online Archive of California AIP Center for History
of Physics
Introduction
to the UCB libraries
|
||||
| Copyright © Cathryn Carson 2001 |