| . |
History 181B: Modern Physics
Class 37 (4/23/03)
Physics, politics, and the state
|
| Navigation |
|
| Outline |
Physicists and politics
What to do with the Bomb
Early efforts from within
The public crusade and the
Scientists' Movement
Physicists and the arms
race
The Cold War and the advisory function
The H-bomb decision (1949-50)
The Oppenheimer case (1953-54)
Campaigns against politically suspect scientists
The state as funder
Change of ideology in the U.S., change of scale
elsewhere
The Manhattan Project as the physicists' utopia
Why do governments fund basic physics research? |
| Names
and terms |
| Primary |
Secondary |
J. Robert Oppenheimer (1904-1967)
James Franck (1882-1964), NP 1925
Franck Report (early summer 1945)
Scientists' Movement
Federation of Atomic (later American) Scientists (FAS)
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (BAS)
H-bomb = hydrogen (fusion, thermonuclear) weapon
Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) |
Frédéric Joliot (1900-1958),
NP 1935 (chemistry)
Patrick Blackett (1897-1974), NP 1948
Pugwash Movement
General Advisory Committee (of the AEC)
House Un-American Activities Committee
Senator Joseph McCarthy |
|
| Assignment |
"Lawrence and his Laboratory: A Historian's
View of the Lawrence Years," on the web
; Arthur Roberts, "Take Away Your Billion Dollars," Physics Today
1:7 (1948): 17-21.
Fourth assignment: Read ch. 4 and episode 3.
How did the Atomic Energy Commission end up responsible
for Lawrence's lab?
What were the scientific payoffs of the new research
program?
What new kinds of knowledge and skill were required?
What might the tradeoffs have been? |
|
|
|
Copyright © Cathryn Carson 2003 |